/ solutions / operations / cost analytics
What a line costs to run, answered in a sentence
Parts, MRO, contractors, freight: operational spend is scattered across the systems that record it, so seeing what a line actually costs means filing a report request and waiting on a BI seat. We clean that data once and put an agent on top, so the cut you need takes a sentence, and a standing audit works waste and off-policy spend as a queue.
Operational spend is scattered across the systems that record it
Parts sit in the ERP, MRO in the maintenance system, contractor invoices in AP, freight in the carrier portals. Each system records its slice, and none of them adds up to what a line or a cost center actually costs to run.
So an operations manager who wants that number files a request to whoever owns the reporting and waits. By the time the chart comes back, the month it covers is already over, and the question has moved on.
Clean the operational data once, then ask for the cut in plain words
We reach those sources, normalize them onto one layer, and make them queryable, and each month appends instead of being rebuilt from scratch. An agent sits on that layer and builds the view you ask for, live: spend by line, by cost center, by vendor, by part, with no report to prepare first.
That is what replaces the BI seat and the report backlog stuck behind one licensed owner. A person still reads the number and makes the call.
A standing audit works operational waste as a queue
Alongside the analytics, a standing audit runs continuously for the waste operational spend hides: parts bought off-contract, duplicate MRO orders, rush freight a planned order would have avoided, contractor hours over the PO. The team stops finding these at year-end when the budget is already spent and starts working them as a queue.
/ start
Start with the cost you cannot see fast enough
Show us where operational spend lives today and what you rebuild by hand, and we scope it, or email hello@mcintoshsystems.com.