/ solutions / it / access requests
Access requests route to the right owner instead of around an email loop
Someone needs into a system, a shared drive, a repository, or an app, and the request turns into a chain of forwarded mail: who owns this, is this person allowed it, do they already have it, who signs off. We build a request lane on our routing and knowledge engine that reads the request, checks it against policy and the entitlements the person already holds, and routes it to the owner who can approve it, so access stops being a loop of forwarded mail.
Today the request bounces around until it finds the right approver
An access request starts vague: a person, a thing they need to get into, and a reason. Before anyone can approve it, someone works out who owns that system, whether policy allows this person that access, and whether they already have it through a group they belong to. That work happens over forwarded email, and the request sits idle between every reply.
The judgment at the end, whether to grant it, is a real decision. Everything in front of it is lookup: matching the request to an owner, a policy, and a set of entitlements. That lookup is what turns a one-line request into a chain of forwarded mail.
The system reads the request and routes it against policy and entitlements
We build the request lane on our routing and knowledge engine. It reads the request, identifies what is actually being asked for, and checks it against two things: the access policy that says who may hold what, and the entitlements the person already carries. A request for access someone already has, or that policy plainly forbids, gets caught there instead of consuming an approver's time.
What is left routes straight to the owner who can approve it, with the policy check and the current entitlements attached, so the approver decides on the facts instead of gathering them first. The requester stops chasing, and the owner stops rebuilding context from an email thread.
A person still approves, and every grant leaves a record
Routing is the system's work. The grant stays a person's decision, made by the owner accountable for that system, on a request that arrives already checked. Nothing provisions itself on the agent's say-so.
Because it runs on your own policy and your own data, every request and approval is a record: who asked for what, which policy it was checked against, who granted it, and when. When a review asks how someone got access, the answer is a query rather than a search of inboxes.
/ start
Start with the access requests clogging your inbox
Tell us how an access request moves today and we scope it, or email hello@mcintoshsystems.com.